The systematic description of such observations may lead to the.which leads to “anchoring†on the initial value. (au)Ī sound approach to rational decision making requires a decision maker to establish decision objectives, identify alternatives, and evaluate those.often violate the axioms of rationality when making decisions under uncertainty. The general conclusion is that it is meaningful for decision theory to treat cases with greater uncertainty than the textbook case of ' decision-making under uncertainty'.
Strategies are proposed for each type of uncertainty. International Nuclear Information System (INIS)įive types of decision-uncertainty are distinguished: uncertainty of consequences, of values, of demarcation, of reliance, and of co-ordination. This method is oriented to improvement of technical-economic values of the examined domain. The goal of this work is a development of a decision-making method under criteria uncertainty with the use of ontologies in the area of multilayer board designing. A critical distinction of the developed method is ontology usage as its base elements. A modification of the mathematical decision support method under uncertainty via ontologies was proposed. The decision-making problem under uncertainty was formalized.
In this context, decision-making under uncertainty, types and conditions of uncertainty were examined. The paper deals with the problem of decision-making under criteria uncertainty. Uncertainty is an essential part of a decision-making procedure. Decision-Making under Criteria Uncertainty
0 kommentar(er)
